A persevering comes into the hospital to see his results from an AIDS test: his results argon positive. The tolerant nervously confesses to the make that he did non bless this disease from his wife, b arly from another woman. His wife and the remediate atomic number 18 tremblers; theyve been takeoff boosters throughout school, and still maintain a good association; they occasionally get together or call from each unity other for advice. The cook never actually met her friends husband in person save, after looking at his file, she notices his last diagnose and phone number are the same as her proficient friends. The unsex then informs the lymph gland of her friendship with his wife. Should she express the wife because he could pass this incurable disease to her? Or should she forbid this information confidential because of her duty as a doctor? This situation creates a moral dilemma because, no press what decision the doctor takes, it will oppose a belief.
In this scenario the patient is the client seeking the service of a doctor. Therefore, the doctor must(prenominal) take a course of action based on mutual agreement that will not violate their relationship. As a professional, her primary duty is to serve the client, which in this scenario is the patient with AIDS; so based on the value of confidentiality, the doctor should respect the patients preferences, which is to keep this unknown.
However, her other obligation is to forewarn her friend that her husband has AIDS; this would prevent her from catching it and dying from this terrible disease. Therefore, if the doctor does not rate her, she compromises the health of her friend. But, if the doctor does enjoin her patients wife she would completely compromises the patients autonomy.
I believe that she should remain silent; if the doctor does tell...
Being honest is always the best policy. If they are truly yours they would no freak out but try to make your sustenance much more livable. Because when you get married you are one no longer two.
wow good essay, very well written, i dont think the doctor made the right choice but i didnt write the esssay, good job!
Good idea! But, why assuming that the client will not tell his wife. This is not some simple disease, people die from AIDS. Therefore, even if the client does not love his wife, why dont we assume that he is human, so he will tell her. I agree that the doctor should stay silent, but she could try to influence the client to tell his wife, or even somehow try to signal it to his wife.
Lenka raises an enkindle point though in your scenario the doctor and wife are friends, occupational roles and obligations aside why not tell her friend that her husband is cheating her? A logical argument to this would be that the information was obtained through her practice. I think you fail to look for all possibilities in this argument.
An interesting dilemna and well written but does not explore all the possibilities. More research almost the Dr.s responsibility in this situation would be valuable. Maybe the Dr. could tell the patient that she knows the wife and guilt him into tellling.
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment