Personal Worldview Inventory Essay

My personal beliefs discombobulate formed me over the course of my livenesstime by p artworky dissimilar influences. Many deal exterminateure made important impact in my life that assume a bun in the oven changed my beliefs in high society and my life. The major two determine that service of process determine my worldview ar beau ideal and Ethics they be the ship canal that assistant me shape my beliefs, and life decisions. I feel the strongest aspect of my worldview is my ugly sense of spirituality and the relationship I subscribe with idol. All of these beliefs help me ever soy day with my decisions. The moral values I see acquire are from many different influences through my lifetime. Strong Catholic influences have been the good tail end to be closer to deity. I have acquire to live a life of compassion, service and checking. Ethical choices that I have made in my life have not been the most hot save they are the ones I live with.One of my beliefs is th at not solely charitables respond or act the same course. It each(prenominal) depends on their world view, background, morals, and personalities. My master(prenominal) cultivation in life is to help others ever since I was a child. I was raised in a very ghostly catholic home. I was the middle child of louvre children in a Hispanic family. I grew up in a sm in all Hispanic community near Mexico. As we were growing up we were exposed to mountain living in poverty and we were expected to help them with what we had. Even though we were not a rich family we would ante up we would watch the effort to donate food and the necessary items to the needy families.We would donate dinners on Christmas Eve to the most unfortunate families with small children for the holiday. This tradition continues to be in my family and now my children are experiencing it. My mother and fatherhave evermore taught us values and morals. I grew up with the belief to help out people in need. While I wa s growing up I cute to be a Doctor or a nurse because my main objective was to help people in need. Now that I have accomplished my dream I am able to help people who are in need by caring for them.What is prime cosmos?One of the many definitions that describe Prime worldly concern is Prime populace is the infinite, personal God revealed in the Holy Scriptures. This God is triune, Transcendent, sovereign and good. (Sire, 2009). It is overly describes God as being a supreme power. God cannot be compared with the study of Cosmos. overly the relationship that man has with God is howling(prenominal) because man can trust God for any problems in life and relate with him in any personal way.In religious pluralism defines Prime veracity generally refers to the belief in two or more religious worldviews as being valid or acceptable. It is a multiple course of study that leads to the same God. Early as the seventeenth century the main conception was the religious working together. Even though Muslims and Christians see in share the most need both have different ideas and precept of God (Tripp, 2000). In Scientism the main concept of Prime reality is main goal is to extend to broaden scientific methods, to the life of humans in society and political issues. In post modernism the Prime reality the main concept is in that location main philosophy that states, There is no sacrosanct truth does not exist. This leads to relativism which means that what is right for one host is not necessarly true for everyone in todays society.What is the nature of the worlds around us?Nature can be interpreted as patterns of relationships. This is support by the Buddhist belief that there is a interconnectedness of all things. This belief does not deny the reality of things that are typically sensed as being in the objectively real world, but it denies that these things have any ontologically isolated centerfield (Tripp, 2000). The basic idea is that there are no substan tial or truly independent essences of things because the essence of any given thing consists in its interconnections with every other thing.The objectively real world cannot exists without us, notbecause minds bring forth the world but because the flavor of our experiences and the things in the world that we typically call objectively real are ontologically interdependent. The ontological essence of each thing consists in its relations to all other things, thus nothing exists unless everything it is related to exists as well. External reality is the way God created the state to work in uniformity and the earth was made out of nothing (Sire, 2009). In a scientism view it was the art of science that started the universe. Chemical reactions within the world is what started life in earth.What is a human being?It is a creature created by God. We are extraordinary machines full of mystery images of God and we were made to serve God. Human beings are created in the image of God and thus possess personality, self-transcendence, intelligence, morality, gregariousness and creativity (Sire, 2009). In postmodernism and scientism human beings are created by matter and there is no foundation of human beings from the beginning or why we exist.What happens to a person at cobblers last?Death is viewed as a gate to meet God and live an eternal life with him. Whatever happens at death is always a mystery. In much religious death once everyone dies they will face judgment by God (Noebel,2006). Death is not the end of life it is the beginning of eternal existence. Postmodernism has no moral absolutes but quite a places responsibility into the hands of the one-on-one. Each absolute belongs into the hands of the individual and thusly each position on after afterlife is relative to an individuals meaning of truth. In scientism death is viewed as the end of life and that a person is not passed to a better life. They also have the belief that near death experiences do not exist. Their only finishing is that there s no scientific evidence that near death experiences are actual afterlife experiences.Why is it possible to hit the hay anything at all?Human beings are the images of God. God gave us the capacity to know and learn from his teachings. In postmodernism the truth about reality itself is forever unfathomed and no explanation. In scientism human reason & the methods of science the universe is liable for knowing everything. Humans werecreated this way(Tripp,2009).How do we know what is right or ruin?We determine what is right or wrong based on our teachings from the watchword and from the word of God. As we are growing up our parents are the ones who teach us the values and morals. The way they learned from their parents. It is guided by the teachings of the bible. In scientism right and wrong are what we decide for our ourselves as humans it may be individually, or families. In postmodernism each person or finis develop their own moral values. It also depends how each individual is raised. They sometimes ask each other is that right for me? How will this help me? Also our actions are determined by our responsibilities as human beings.What is the meaning of human history?The meaning of history for people who follow a real religion is creation, fall and redemption. God is wonderful and has a plan for everyone. God is in total control of the world. The main purpose of God was to create man and have a good relationship with him. God gave us the tools to follow him and if we commit sin God is always willing to pardon us. In postmodernism their belief is that human history is the study of ones culture over another. It is main concept is relative, the postmodernist will be will to rewrite history to try to convince other in believing what is better for them. In scientism history has no purpose. Also they believe that someday the plant will freeze up or burn down and will be the end of life.ConclusionAll human beings have a pu rpose in life, regardless of their worldview. We should respect them and love them the way they are. Sometimes they will learn from each other and obtain the prescribed beliefs from each other. A good paper, Shirley. I would like to have seen you give more attention and analysis to pluralism, scientism and postmodernism. Still, this is a good paper.ReferencesNoebel, D(2006). Understanding the times The Collision of Todays Competing Worldview 2nd(ed) Summit Press.Sire, J. (2009). The universe next door. (5 ed.). Downers Grove, Illinois intravenous pyelogram Academic. Tripp, D (2000). Where did I come from. Exploring Christianity. Retrieved on June 26, 2015 from www.christanity.co.nz