No child left behind Essay

No pincer Is odd shadow (NCLB) is a national incur act of 2001 which was proposed by the hencece president, George W. Bush immediately after beingnessness inaugurated in to the White House. This legal framework was aimed at ensuring that the primary and indirect raising system was ameliorate by advocating for increase right and foil in its management. It further focused on the training system increased the flexibility on how pargonnts discharge choose the learning institution their siblings go forth attend. This paper provides a broad overview of the act and it includes its history, scope, player selectd chall(a)enges, among different issues.Brief discussion of the relevant history The law was authored by canful Boehner and Judd Gregg, a representative and a senator respectively from the Republican Party and George moth miller and Edward Kennedy, a senator respectively from the Democratic Party. It was then signed by G. W. Bush. Beside aiming at improving the d oing primary and secondary study and change magnitude accountability, breakd the focus on development and re-authored the 1965 Elementary and Secondary Act. The act was brought onwards in the 107th congress whereby it was passed in the House of Representatives and US senate on 2001, may 23rd and 2004, June 14th respectively.It was later signed in to law on 2002, January 8th. Scope The act was brought to the lime light after realization the graphic symbol of the discipline being offered was directly affecting the students, parents and all the citizens at large. At the inter home(a) level, since the man was becoming a global village as a result of globalization, the bore of knowledge needed to purifyd since more than of the the Statesns children had little hope in the future due to graduate(prenominal) levels of illiteracy and low self esteem (self doubt).The act was of paramount essence since the US, the world largest economy needed to produce intellectuals that would transform America and the globe at large. Context (historical, political, economic, social) At the time George W. Bush introduced this blueprint, he noted that though the American was entering the 21st century with a lot of hollo and hope, many of the children who were in need of study support and aid were being ignored and thereby left around. 70% of the fourth graders residing in the inner city could not read or even pass the national reading trial which involved the elementary level of education.The senior high school student in other parts of the world, S come forwardh Africa and Cyprus to be specific perform very unwell on the international maths test. Almost a 1/3 of the college freshmen of American origin take compulsory remedial courses prior to initiating the regular college level courses It is the responsibility of the parents, nominate and all the citizens to en sure that fictitious character education is guaranteed for all the American children in order to have a bright future.This has not been the case and the joined Sates Federal Government is to be blamed for condoning the poor results and failing to treat the failure in the education system. The federal government has controlled the Americans, schools since through education policies since 1965 when the first major initiative on the elementary secondary was undertaken. Since then the federal government has established so many course of studys/ projects geared towards facilitation of prize education. A major drawback for these programs is that the results have not been analyzed to evaluate whether the programs happen upon their objectives or not.Another factor for the failure of the programs is that they are formulated by the congress and the topical anesthetics are not consulted, as a result, local people education unavoidably are not addressed. There have been programs that are formulated for every one education program and this had led to a pile of programs across the federa l sound outs. These programs costed the federal government hundred billions each year but quality of education on the other glove has been falling since the objectives are not being realized. This has resulted to a wide and an increasing gap between the rich and the poor in America.Faced with this dilemma, rough citizens have proposed that the federal government should not be involved the education sector. Another proportion of the population suggests that the new programs should be added to the old education system. , the federal government was therefore required to come up with potent programs and projects which would restore confidence in to the American education system. After a braining search of the outflank option, the federal government came up with the No kidskin is Left back polity which would transform the American education system.During the sign language of the bill, the then US president, George W. Bush said Weve got large challenges here in America. Theres no greater challenge than to make sure that every child and all of us on this stage hatch every child, not just a few children, every single child, regardless of where they live, how theyre raised, the income level of their family, every child receive a first-class education in America. Individuals/agencies involved including a discussion of the major decision makersThe No Child is Left bottom of the inning policy would involve a number of parties in order to transform the American education system, these entities include o The teachers o The parents o The local citizens o The federal government The teachers leading be involved in ensuring the No Child is Left Behind policy work. They will be trained to improve their quality. The schools that will perform nearly will be recognizeed while those not achieving the expected results will be sanctioned. The federal government is expected to memory the training of school teachers and improve the schools in general.The parents are re quired to oversee the performance of their children and at the same time access more selective information concerning the performance of his/her child from the school administration. Additional funds will be provided to the state and district schools by so that they can become more flexible. The local society is required to tick off that it provide a conducive learning environment so that the students can utilize their potential to the outstrip of their capability (Hammond 2007). Major stakeholders involved (who the policy/issue affects, who has an interest in the policy)Among the major stakeholders who will be involved and will be unnatural by the NCLB will include the students, the teachers, parent, the local authorities and the federal government. The teachers will be required to play a crucial role in ensuring that the gap between the poor and rich is closed by ensuring that they advance high standards and accountability, offering annual academic assessment to children whi ch will then be evaluated by the parents. The teachers are further required to give reading a priority.The parents are expected to work fast with the teachers so that they can assist in progress of the children education. The parents flexibility and option for schools will excessively increase. The local authorities are expected to guarantee the teacher protection, enhance school safety, rescue the schools from the schools that are not safe and advocate for use education. o The federal government is expected to provide funds and reward to the well playacting schools and states in terms of accountability and transparency.The government will overly give the teachers some initiatives like tax deduction in order to promote their performance. The role public administrators play in the policy/issue The public administers are expected to ensure that the funds provided by the federal government are utilized in the most high-octane was possible while at the same time making certain( a) that they reach the targeted entities. The public administrators are further expected to evaluate the performance of the school.They should also give feedback to the federal government on matter concerning the strength of the No Child is Left Behind policy in meeting the academic needs of the American people (Samier, et, al, 2008). Policy alternatives and solutions Currently this is the best education program that has been formulated in the US. Proper implementation of the program will ensure that it becomes perfect since it will be evaluated from time to time. disciplinary measure will be put in place to ensure that the expected results are achieved. Challenges facing policy implementation and solutionThe policy is faced with a number of challenges prior to its implementation. One of major connoisseur is on the use of standards to gauge the performance of the states and schools. The schools or each state can lower their standards so that they cam purport to have improved in their performance. This is because each state has the capacity to set its own standards. This means that the incentives and penalties (sanctions) provided by the government would end up on the hand of wrong persons. This job therefore calls for standardization of the examination if at all there is an expectancy of correct unbiased results (Uzzell (2005).The use of standardized within states reduced the quality of education since the teachers teach the test to ensure that the students performs well in the schools. They, teachers, further teach the areas that are expected to be tested in the lowest standard exams. The standardized tests are also against Individuals With Disabilities Education Act. The tests have also been condemned of promoting cultural bias since different culture value certain skills than others. To subdue this kind of bias, the policy of standardized test should be re-evaluated in perspicaciousness and a sustainable standard established (Abernathy 2007).The i ssue of offering incentives to the schools playing poorly enables the schools to continue performing poorly. The schools that are rewarded after performing well in the standards test is likely to push out the poorly performing students so that hey can maintain the standards. In order to ensure that the poorly performing schools improve they should be offered with technical expertise and not monetary resources. The top performing schools on the other hand should be closely monitored to ensure that the poor students are not expelled on academic grounds.The No Child is Left Behind policy focuses manly on the eye subjects, that is English and Mathematics, this has made the student to improve in these two subjects while the other broader education is lost. This therefore requires the NCLB policy to be considerate of other skills and subjects to ensure that education meets its purpose (Menken 2008). Importance of the No Child is Left Behind policy Its enables the children to understand the policies that have been implemented in the efforts to improve the quality of education in order to face the global challenges in bold.Precisely, the understanding of this policy enables a person to understand the existing education policys roots, challenges and its core values. This policy is also an indication of the federal government interest in leading the global by providing its citizens with quality education which will ensure that the illiteracy level decreases significantly. The policy also explains in details the expected level of participation by all the parties involved in ensuring that it is a success. The policy also explains the importance of the accountability and transparency for any program or policy to succeed (Peterson, et, al, 2003).Overview of the crucial values Irrespective of the stake holders involved in implementing this policy, is of great substance to evaluate the important values of the No Child is Left Behind policy. This policy is expected to o R esult to grades for tests o General emolument of all the standards o Increased accountability of all resources in the schools o Creating opportunity for the minority groups o General improvement of the quality of education o Offering the parent the option to select school for children o Guarantying of the federal funding ConclusionThough the change is well formulated, it needs to be cleansed off some of the issues that are raising eyebrows. It needs to be refined to address all the children depending on their needs. The policy provides clearly diminutive guidelines which will ensure that the quality of the education system in America greatly improves to solve the ever increasing global challenges. While canvas the old and the new education programs, this new NCLB is likely to have mend results since it focus on all the children with emphasis on the children from the minority groups.The local population, citizens and the federal government should ensure that the proper implementa tion and evaluation is carried out to make certain that the best results are achieved. As time passes by, a research should be carried out to find out area or clauses that need to be changed for upgrading of the programs.References Abernathy Scott Franklin (2007) No Child Left Behind and the commonplace Schools, Michigan, University of Michigan Press, (pp 130-149). Hammond Linda D. (2007) Evaluating No Child Left Behind retrieved on 18th, November, 2008, in stock(predicate) at http//www. thenation.com/doc/20070521/darling-hammond Menken Kate (2008) English Learners Left Behind Standardized interrogatory as Language Policy, NY, Multilingual Matters Press (pp 118-140) Samier Eugenie Angele, Stanley Adam (2008) Political Approaches to educational Administration and Leadership, NY, Routledge, (pp 139-154) Peterson Paul E. , West Martin R. (2003) No Child Left Behind? The Politics and Practice of School Accountability, Brookings, Brookings Institution Press, (pp13-14) Smith Marilyn C ochran (2004) Walking the itinerary Race, Diversity, and Social Justice in Teacher Teachers College Press (p 157)The white house, tune-up by President George W. Bush, retrieved on 18th, November, 2008, available at http//www. whitehouse. gov/news/reports/no-child-left-behind. hypertext markup language The White House, President Signs Landmark No Child Left Behind Education Bill, retrieved on 18th, November, 2008, available at http//www. whitehouse. gov/news/releases/2002/01/20020108-1. html Uzzell Lawrence A. (2005) No Child Left Behind The Dangers of Centralized Education Policy, retrieved on 18th, November, 2008, available at http//www. cato. org/pub_display. php? pub_id=3769